Minister, your statement that there is no evidence of risk to human health is shaped or informed by past studies that only considered limited exposure pathways.
The federal risk assessment actually found measured concentrations of benzene and methylnaphthalene in the groundwater.
I'm just wondering how you can claim that there is no risk to human health and what that is based on. Clearly, there are toxins in the environment in an area that the community uses. Clearly, these studies were not done properly, by your own admission.
How can you claim that the site has no risk to human health?