There's really no comparison to the U.S. and Canada in terms of the reliance on the economy of rail and how much it's integrated. Certainly in Europe, you have more movement by barge, etc. It's there that we need to focus, and it's also the integrated nature of our economy and the integrated nature of the rail system to make sure that what we're doing in Canada doesn't create a sticky border for the movement of goods, because that's not in anybody's interest. We can align, and we can drive improvements in areas that are unique to Canada.
Nothing in particular comes to mind, but I would say, again, Canada is a leader. The range of reforms the fire chief talked about after Lac-Mégantic and the commitment by governments—all governments—and by all stakeholders in the transportation value chain to prevent that from ever happening again are very serious.
We have taken the best of what's coming out of the United States in terms of new tank car standards and other things. Look at ERAPs as one example—and we can talk more about those. One of the key calls for action for the United States after the East Palestine incident was why they don't have ERAPs like Canada does.
There are some good things up here. The work is, “And what's next?” and not, “We don't have anything; it's not functioning, and it's not good.” It's, “Where are we, and where's the best place we can make more improvements with best efforts going forward?”