First, yes. One key measure, after Lac-Mégantic, was so-called “protective directive 36”. The railways must provide the registered municipalities with information on the dangerous goods that go through those communities, and they must do that twice annually.
Do they know that for every shipment? No, not necessarily beforehand, but I'm coming back to that—the chief also mentioned this earlier—and that's the first piece. Every community has the ability to look at that list and see what's going through. How that community wishes to communicate that information to its own citizens is at their discretion.
The second thing the chief mentioned, a very important piece, is the AskRail initiative, if you will. A first responder—or anybody, really, who's registered—can go on, and if you see a tank car—when the mayor talked about, “Hey, there are tank cars on an intersection, and I don't know what's in them”—you simply put the number of that car in, and it will tell you what's in that car at that time, so that information's available.
Again, the other initiative, which is more after the fact, is the CANUTEC information. When you have an incident, you can get instantaneous results 24-7 from the CANUTEC initiative.
First responders, especially those with the competencies and people.... When we talk about ERAPs, remember, these get tested, if you will, on an ongoing basis. That's part of the requirement. Typically, a company, whoever owns the ERAP—it'll be the shipper or the rail company, or it could be a trucking company as well—and the emergency contractors and first responders on the routes for that product are going to sit down every year and refresh their knowledge of that chemistry, that substance, what's going through and how they have to respond to incidents.
There's a range of things, but those are key aspects of that information.