As long as the railways and those who transport hazardous materials by rail aren't responsible for the damage caused by an incident or accident, the current situation will suit them. Today, all we're talking about is the responsibility of firefighters and municipalities.
Mr. Masterson clearly explained the philosophy behind this by saying that he's working to limit the damage. He isn't saying that he makes sure there's no damage or that he pays for the damage. I'm not calling him anything by saying that. He's absolutely right. That's what we're seeing, and what he's confirming today.
However, I think we need to change that paradigm so that the railways and the companies that move dangerous goods by rail take responsibility for the damage they cause. I'll give you a concrete example. The companies didn't pay for what happened in Lac‑Mégantic; it was the government. So citizens paid for that. It cost over $500 million.