I was going to answer your question to say that any event that resulted in any sort of disruption or stoppage to one of two of Canada's national railways is a catastrophic event, frankly, for every single sector in the country and in particular for the grain sector.
There are certain things that we have control over and certain things that we don't. We don't have control over wildfires, floods, avalanches and cold weather and things of that nature, so what we rely upon is the railways to have excess capacity available in cars, crews and locomotives to be able to catch up when these disruptions that we don't control happen. We don't see that happening in our railways. They often get way behind and it takes months and months to catch up and in some cases they simply don't.
On the labour side of things, that's actually something we can control. We feel very strongly that in such an obvious essential service—it's the absolute lifeblood of our economy—it should be essential. Quite frankly, if either railway management or the union in question believes that their positions are reasonable they should have no hesitation at all to submit themselves to binding arbitration. It's an ongoing mystery why our rail services aren't considered essential and taken care of that way from a regulatory point of view.