The Bloc Québécois believes that the definition of what constitutes a safety reason, which the regulations allow air carriers to use to explain a disruption, could be misused by some carriers to justify their decision not to compensate their customers.
From your perspective as an airport administrator, should we be looking at a law that is more like the European Union law? It does not even include safety as a justification for a disruption that is the responsibility of the carrier. There, if a problem is the carrier's responsibility, they take full responsibility, including compensation.