Absolutely. I may have misrepresented that. What I meant was that when we're in an emergency situation like dealing with the passengers on train 55, absolutely this line of communication has to be constant, and it was.
When we're dealing with the removal of a derailed train and talking about when the line is going to open up again, we don't receive minute-to-minute information from the people on the site. These activities actually happen on a longer timeline. We try to provide Via with accurate information on a timely basis, but this isn't continuous. This is something where we'd say, “Let's have another update in two hours, because the estimated line clearance time will be 30 hours from now.” They would not get updates every 15 minutes or every 10 minutes. They would get updates every two or three hours.
Then, when we have a final line clearance, or an estimate of when the line is going to open up again, we sit together and we plan the resumption of service. How many trains can it take? When can we take them? When would you like to run them? What trains would you like to run first?
So yes, there was a lot of communication. It's the basis for our success and for their success. I can't speak for the communications they had with their own passengers. I wasn't privy to that—