Certainly, there is a lot of work under way in managing biodiversity on the west coast, and a lot of engagement with first nations as well when it comes to co-governing our marine waterways. You're correct that marine transportation is focused on decarbonizing over the next several decades. The challenge we have is that we're not sure what the fuel of choice will be for many vessels in the future. That choice will drive what vessels are being built. It's kind of a chicken-and-egg situation: We need fuels to be available, but we don't have a clear decision as to which fuels will be preferred.
Vessels are already slowing down for southern resident killer whales to reduce underwater noise. What's happening with new marine protected areas is that there's a discussion around minimum standards of what can actually happen in marine protected areas. From our perspective, we would like to see designated low-impact marine corridors for shipping, where we can either reduce speed or require certain fuels.
There is still a lot of work to be done. We need the required infrastructure. We don't have adequate port reception facilities if, for instance, we're to mitigate all discharges from vessels. I think Prince Rupert doesn't even have an adequate reception facility, in any case.