Thank you for that. I have limited time.
I'll get to the crux of it and try to come out of this with some meat on the bone with respect to the takeaways, the next steps.
If I'm hearing you right, one is that the discussions can be moved forward with respect to ensuring that your individual strategic plans become more integrated and more multimodal in nature. That is point one.
Point two, as we move forward with those strategic plans—including your capital investment, which would support itself as a secondary plan—is to give them the capacity they need to then move forward with the...I'll use the word “infrastructure” that you're going to require.
The second part of that is to also have those integrated discussions with our American partners, to integrate the supply chain so that it has more fluidity. Further to that, to give it more fluidity, the infrastructure investments that must be made will be not only domestic but also binational. Whether it's a road, a rail line.... We have the Great Lakes; it's binational.
To integrate, whether it's digital data or the logistics and distribution systems, and to work with our American partners on the same piece of water would be prudent. That's my second takeaway. Going from your comments, that would have to happen as well, that binational relationship to discuss those capital integrated investments. The fluidity within the supply chain has to happen as well.