I might have some different views.
A binational strategy does sound interesting and is probably worth pursuing to a certain degree, but we have to be careful that we don't.... In trying to change our regulations, we should focus on streamlining regulations to make business more achievable here in Canada and not on alignment with other jurisdictions just for the sake of alignment. There are some things, frankly, on the regulatory side in the U.S., that we would not want to see here in Canada at all, like some of the new rules that were put in place by the Federal Maritime Commission in the U.S. within the last 12 months. Those types of practices here in Canada would create a lot of restriction and a lot of stress in the shipping sector. We would have to approach that very carefully.
I think there are certainly good things that could probably be taken from the American model. The way in which they fund ports and port infrastructure might be one area to look at. Funding in that sector has a different model than the one we have here in Canada, as you know, so it's definitely worth looking at that. However, as to mirroring regulations for the sake of alignment in itself, we would not be in support of that.