All right. What I'm hearing from you is that the scope of the project as currently defined is broad enough to include high-speed rail as it's traditionally defined. It's just curious that the government promotes it as a “high-frequency” rail project with speeds of 200 kilometres an hour, and not “high-speed”. They talk about it in a fair amount of detail, which seems to be putting their thumbs on the scale of what they are expecting from these private sector proponents. I'll just leave that there.
My other question is around procurement and whether a formal evaluation was conducted looking at public procurement versus the P3 model on value for money, risk and the public interest. Was there a formal evaluation prior to the request for expressions of interest?