Thank you, Chair.
My question is for Counsel Duguay.
You had testified earlier about transparency in the procurement policy, so I'd like to ask you some questions about that.
We have some incongruent information that I touched upon in the Order Paper of May 9, 2021, provided to the government operations committee. In that response, as I stated, you listed five contracts back in March 2021 that the Infrastructure Bank engaged in with McKinsey. The bank's submission later to the government operations committee says there were three contracts. Indeed, the document provided to us by you includes five invoices, not three.
As a lawyer, I know that you have both a fiduciary obligation to the CIB and a professional obligation as a lawyer, so is it fair for me to conclude that since you provided five invoices and you listed five contracts on your Order Paper disclosure that there were actually five contracts? You could internally divide them up the way that they were, but these invoices and these payments and these descriptions show five different engagements. Is that correct?