The criteria is changing. My view is that there's been a mission creep from the very crude privatization things that were happening before—Highway 407, and other things that people just see as a complete outreach—and the original P3 model, which was design-build finance. Design-build is only one way of doing construction as compared to the traditional, and there are pros and cons, but it's the creep of adding “maintain an operation” that strips public accountability and public control. People can't find out what the facts are on these projects that move forward. People are unable to find out and hold politicians accountable.
For the finance houses, for the big people who run consultancies, whether it's direct accounting firms or others, or the law firms that I mentioned, this is a bonanza in terms of return on investment. There was a study done in Europe some years ago that looked at how manufacturing was no longer a big return on investment, and land, at that point, wasn't. It looked at public services as the next place for global finance to focus on by privatizing public services through public-private partnerships.