Finally, we've heard some testimony and a belief that perhaps labour representatives—and I know there are some others—who believe that active port users should be able to have active employees of their companies sit on the board.
Can you explain, from your perspective...?
You talked about the fiduciary duty. Do you see a conflict of interest if a person who's actively involved in labour at the port or actively involved in business at the port is given a seat at the table on the board of directors?