If there's a better avenue, why would we support an amendment that's not the best avenue?
When I asked about amendment NDP-3, we heard about the concerns around safety and removing discretion from the minister.
Does this amendment still relate only to vessels that have been directed by the minister because of a threat, or is this 14-day prohibition on all vessel traffic at all times?
I guess that question would go to the witnesses. What are we talking about here? Would this amendment apply just to traffic directed by the minister, or to all vessel traffic?