I think it's important in this instance to remember section 16 as a ministerial order power. As such, it is discretionary. It's intended to be used, as we've discussed, to deal with circumstances in which there are risks to the security of marine transportation and coastal communities, etc., as has been suggested.
However, what we're trying to do is predict situations in which the power would be used and limit the minister's discretion to direct that the vessel take anchor elsewhere. I think that in an attempt to do that, we're dealing with theoretical situations, and we're removing the power of the minister to deal with a security risk and a potential security risk that could be resolved.
Because of the theoretical nature of the question, it's hard to describe a situation in which it could be potentially be necessary for the anchorage to take place in the areas prescribed in the schedule, but I suppose that is the nature of the problem: It's that we don't know what risk the minister may face, and there may be a justifiable reason to direct a vessel to a specific location that would otherwise be prohibited.