The legislation's scope is meant to relate to security risks. Given the original scope of the ministerial order power would be a security risk, I assume that the movement of the vessel from one location to another would be to improve the security situation and not cause a greater security risk to exactly the communities you're describing, but in the absence of a fact situation that we could point to, it's hard to justify or argue against the prescribing of the areas.
On November 22nd, 2023. See this statement in context.