The whole text, Mr. Chair—and I appreciate Mr. Badawey's suggestion—reads:
manage the marine infrastructure and services in a commercial manner that encourages, and takes into account, input from users, Indigenous peoples and the community in which a port or harbour is located
—and then our addition—
or in proximity to which vessels are regularly anchored
This isn't just about the area that a port has jurisdiction over. It's also the area affected by its activities. It could be just outside of that, but the port has influence over those activities. For instance, “Indigenous peoples” could include indigenous people who reside in the larger territory and are affected by the port's activities.
This is pretty high-level language. It simply states that when the port manages the marine infrastructure and services in a commercial manner, they should also take into account these broader factors. In most cases, that will be areas under their jurisdiction, but I think there are cases in which the impact of the activity of the port actually extends outside of the specific geography that they have jurisdiction over. They should take that into account as well. That's the intention.