Sure. I was kind of half listening, because I was trying to type the subamendment that Mr. Badawey so generously moved.
The idea here is essentially that we're dealing with a situation in which there's a security threat or an environmental threat. Something is wrong with the vessel. The minister determines that they should direct the vessel to a certain place. The amendment is saying that you need to stay out of these sensitive areas, as the vessel is directed, unless the minister is of the opinion that no other safe option exists.
That would provide a discretionary override that would allow the minister to direct a burning vessel, a vessel with a security situation on board, a vessel where someone has had a cardiac arrest.... If there's no other safe option, then the vessel could be directed anywhere within the zone that is also sensitive. That's the idea.