Mr. Chair, I completely disagree with you on that, and I am going to explain why.
First, what is not defined in proposed amendment BQ‑3.2 is defined in proposed amendment BQ‑4.1. It is definitely not defined, because it will be defined in another amendment.
Second, you say it goes beyond the scope of the bill. If that is the case, it is a serious problem.
The fact is that when the government introduced its bill publicly, the only article that was published in the entire Quebec press was entitled “Un projet de loi pour resserrer la collaboration entre les ports”—A bill to provide for closer collaboration among ports. However, this bill contains absolutely nothing that allows collaboration among ports, despite the fact that the minister said that was the case.
We are proposing something that is entirely consistent with what the minister said. I absolutely do not see why what we are presenting here today would not be in order.