I want to comment that I think the idea of a particular screen may be a good solution, because otherwise what's happening here is that the Conservative amendments are at cross-purposes. On the one hand, there is a desire to make sure that appointments happen more quickly, knowing that there sometimes is a pool that's not inexhaustible, and that there are parameters around inclusion, competence and so on. On the other hand, the conversation here could be seeking to reduce the pool.
My thought is that there are many provincial officials who have nothing to do with the port but may have something to do with supply chain, or safety and security standards for the long-term health care system, or something very unrelated to what could create a conflict of interest. They may have a basic experience and competency that would make them an excellent board member. I wanted to make that observation. It's not all port people that we're talking about in the provincial government or municipal government.