Certainly, we have.... I think ours is very similar to that.
To the witnesses here, we're talking about, obviously, a case in which the chair is incapacitated or removed and then the vice-chair is incapacitated or removed. We're talking about a fairly uncommon occurrence here, I think, for proposed section 17.1, in which we're down to the third-in-command acting as the chair. What is the current process, in legislation, for a board of directors at a port, if both the chair and the vice-chair are unable to act?