In the same vein as what I think I heard Mr. Barsalou-Duval say, I would be happy to withdraw CPC-5, knowing that negativing clause 105 would achieve the same result.
Knowing now what we've heard on the kinds of partitions that save one and not the other, deleting the entire clause actually achieves both things, which is to remove the minister's power to select the chair, which we heard again and again was not in the best interest of the port and makes this “Chairperson—absence or incapacity” in proposed section 17.1 unnecessary. That would be upcoming. We would simply, having heard what we heard from the witnesses, believe that the best thing we can do is to delete this clause in its entirety.