Again, I'm not a legislative clerk, but it would be my.... The reason that we specifically selected those (14)(1)(a) and (d) positions, which have now been amended, was that all of the rules apply except for who's doing the appointing at this point. That would be the intention: Paragraphs 14(1)(a) and (d) would remain intact, and if (d) has been amended to include user groups, which now include specific labour consultation, then the expectation would be that it would be maintained.
Again, I'm open to either standing this and coming back to it, or I'm happy to suspend if we believe we can wrestle this to the ground in a few minutes.