I think I'm on the same page as Mr. Strahl. Under the current process, I am unclear on the gap that exists under the current law. Members of the board choose a chair from among their ranks. I would assume that if someone is temporarily incapacitated, the board could pass a resolution temporarily appointing someone else as the chair or vice-chair or third vice-president, or whatever the position may be. Is there anything to preclude that?
It seems that under current law, the board is the master of its destiny when it comes to its chair, and there should be nothing to prevent it from either temporarily or permanently appointing a new chair when it needs to. I guess the question is, where does the gap exist under current law, and why are we entertaining the proposal?