My hope is that it would be consistent with what we're pushing the government to do nationally. Our federal greenhouse gas commitments specify absolute reductions as opposed to relative reductions. I think it only makes sense that we require the same when specifying other climate plans and other targets of other entities.
There are gains to be made through efficiencies, of course, but what we're talking about, as a country, is reducing the absolute amount, in tonnes of greenhouse gases, that we're putting into the atmosphere. Other objectives, economic growth, population growth, etc., have to fall within that constraint.
Really what we're talking about is the fact that, over time, our emissions need to go down. Not only is that applicable to us as a country, but it's applicable to the entire planet. We're talking about absolute emissions reductions, as opposed to intensity-based reductions or relative emissions reductions.
That's the intention there. I hope that helps to clarify it.