Given the language in the proposed amendment, it's impossible to say exactly how it would be interpreted, but it does use the language “must”—that the regulations “must prohibit”. Therefore, I think we can interpret that to be literal.
Rachel Heft Manager and Senior Counsel, Transport and Infrastructure Legal Services, Department of Transport
Given the language in the proposed amendment, it's impossible to say exactly how it would be interpreted, but it does use the language “must”—that the regulations “must prohibit”. Therefore, I think we can interpret that to be literal.
See context to find out what was said next.