The first answer, to me, was the most illustrative, which is that the regulatory process takes quite a bit of time. Therefore, the alarmist commentary that Mr. Strahl was providing.... Although I understand how he interpreted it that way, I don't think that's actually the reality that would unfold. We've seen with other regulatory commitments that the reality is that the government takes quite a bit of time to consult people, put together the regulations, consult people on the regulations and put together amended regulations. That can take three or four years.
Even on the very fastest timeline that this bill would envision, it would still only come into effect a couple of years before the 2030 commitment. Maybe that's something that can be refined with subamendments, but this is just to be clear about what we're talking about here for anyone watching who thinks that, as soon as this vote is done, it's going to cause cataclysmic change.