If I hear well virtually, we were on clause 123. The opposing colleague was speaking, and my colleague Vance asked for a point of order on relevance. Following that was the challenge of the chair's position to go forward.
That matter has been decided. It's been voted on and we need to move on to the next. I don't think we need to go backwards and get more explanation if the chair has already taken a position, his position has been challenged and a vote has been held. That clarifies that matter and it's time to move forward.
Mr. Chair, I would like you to see to it that we move forward and not reiterate what happened in the past.
Thank you, Mr. Chair.