Thank you, Mr. Chair, and thank you again to the witnesses for joining us here this evening.
I want to see if I can tie it in here. I know that we're already done with BQ-6, but I think this is very relevant to the conversation. If I'm reading this correctly.... I'm looking for clarification, please. NDP-16 says, “under such an order, must not be exercised or performed for the purpose of terminating a strike or lock-out or imposing a settlement in a labour dispute.” What if there was an imminent threat or imminent harm to our port terminals? Would the minister still be able to use his powers to force workers back?