I just need some clarification. I'm a little bit confused here as to what is happening. I do understand that with Standing Order 116, when debate is ended.... It seems like we've invoked Standing Order 60 to adjourn debate, somehow. If you look at Standing Order 67(1)(o), it is clearly in conflict with that, because Standing Order 60 says that you can only adjourn “unless otherwise prohibited in these Standing Orders”. When you look at Standing Order 67(1)(o), it clearly states that debate is permissible. It gives the elements of when debate is permissible. If you go to Standing Order 67 and look at “Debatable motions”, (o) says it's “for the suspension of any standing order unless otherwise provided”.
If you take that into context, and we then say that Standing Order 116 is being suspended by your order—