In the context of previous actions, we would have to go through an analysis of the situation and the evidence at that time and then try to apply what the provision would look like. I don't have all of the evidence and all of the information at hand so that we could go through that whole assessment in terms of how or when this would be applied to various situations.
We've been looking at scenarios, for example, in the context of geopolitical unrest. A terminal operator, for example, may refuse to accept certain shipments or refuse to load certain shipments. It would ensure that we are able to continue to preserve the security of Canada's competition and prevent that kind of harm from occurring. That would certainly be one example.
Another example may be in the event of a climate disaster or some other event that would require certain actions to be taken by port authorities or terminal operators in a very short period of time.
Those are the types of events that we are looking at. It is a twofold test, and there is a high threshold. It is meant to be a high threshold. It is not meant to be an order that is used lightly or without appropriate due diligence, urgency and a risk of significant harm.