No, no. The point of order is around relevance. In explaining my point of order, I believe that the reference would only be relevant if it deals with clause 18. Perhaps it's partly a question to the legislative clerk as to the extent of relevance. If a clause references a specific section of an act, is it therefore relevant to refer to other parts of that act?
I'm listening carefully to Mr. Strahl's contribution, and it seems to me that he's reading at length—