That would be immensely important, yes. Why have that law out there, whatever it may be—the Impact Assessment Act, the emissions cap, etc.? Why have these laws at all? If you want the power to override them, then you're basically telling all of us that they're bad. If they're bad, why keep them on the books? Get rid of them.
Like I said before in my opening remarks, if you're an international investor, I'd be very distrustful, and Canada depends a lot on foreign investment. Even on domestic investment, too, if you're looking at keeping those problematic laws on the books, yet you're saying, “Oh, we may override them from time to time just to do this particular project”....
Mind you, we have very loosey-goosey sorts of regulations around and so on. If I were a foreign investor, I'd avoid them like the plague, but that's what we need: We need investment badly. It has plummeted in Canada over the last number of years. Without it, we're going to remain a weak economy, at the bottom of the G7 like we are now, and we'll have a lower standard of living for all Canadians, because let's face it. If the economy isn't good, nobody's having a good time.