I think it starts to.
I agree with the chief that we should separate these two parts of the bill, because they're very different and they need different consideration. Sticking them together and.... Everybody opposes omnibus bills when they're in opposition, but then, when they're in government, they include all the omnibus bills because they want the controversial stuff included with the stuff that other people would normally agree with.
I think it makes a start, to be fair, but—boy—I've been around this issue for a long time, many decades. Everybody agrees with it, but then nothing or very little actually happens. I'd like to see more specifics around it. Everyone has good intentions, but when it comes right down to the details, you see provinces hanging on to their little fiefdoms of whatever kind and the federal government not doing too much about that. I would like to see it go an awful lot further. Once again, generics are politically acceptable because, “Oh, they're trying to do something about this,” but anybody who knows the history of interprovincial trade barriers knows we need a lot more precise action than we have seen in the bill.