I'll say this: I don't have specific amendments, as I do not have a mandate from the chiefs in assembly to provide a position on how this bill can be amended. However, I will say that you should hear from first nations rights holders directly, and that we are concerned about cabinet's absolute power to determine what projects of national interest are based on what cabinet thinks is in the best interests of first nations. We are also concerned that cabinet can unilaterally choose that laws don't apply, like the Impact Assessment Act.
We are concerned that the duty to consult and the United Nations declaration are not operationalized within the bill. We are concerned about the Indian Act's inclusion in schedule 2 of the bill, and it should be taken out. Those are, just generally, what we heard from chiefs across the country in our Monday discussion.
At the same time, they need time to get their lawyers to review things, their policy analysts, traditional people in their communities, elders and youth, but they haven't had that time. Many of them are still fighting fires. They haven't even had, probably, time to look at this act.
I don't know, Julie, whether you have anything further to add to that.