Thank you. Your response is quite informative.
Another point came to mind during your remarks. I'm talking about the notion of national interest found in the bill in question.
In the bill, the definition of “national interest” simply refers to a project named in Schedule 1. According to the bill, the definition of “national interest project” is as follows: “project named in Schedule 1”. This includes everything listed in Schedule 1 and designated by the Governor in Council. I gather from your comments that this doesn't fit with the Supreme Court's definition of a national interest project.
Do you feel that there's some confusion between two types of national interest projects, or that we're talking about the same kind of national interest project?