I'm not a lawyer, but I do know that in the Comeau case heard in the Supreme Court, they did say that if provinces, for example, had a legitimate health and safety factor, not as a primary deterrent to stop interprovincial trade, but had those legitimate health and safety issues....
If this law does pass unamended, does that...? Again, it might be unfair because you may not have legal counsel to advise on this, but to me, it sounds like the federal government would have the same ability to say it's not accepting that lower standard, but then enforceability, I think, is the challenge here.