You asked it in the negative, but I'll put it in the positive.
If the government is serious and gets behind doing major projects.... I'm going to need to make a distinction here between major projects and a whole bunch of other economic activity that can happen at the exact same time. They can be myopically focused on the major project, but there's a lot of other economic activity that can go on.
Investors will come to the table and bring capital to the table. My experience right now in raising capital globally is that it's looking for a home in things that are of particular interest and can provide the return, but have the confidence of governments at various levels and indigenous peoples that they're moving forward in lockstep together. Capital will then come forward.
First of all, I don't ever invest if the indigenous community is not on board from the beginning. Fundamentally, the way that capital works is it's going to drive toward things that it likes. Canada hasn't had a lot of really big, major national projects in a while and got behind them with a head of steam. I think Bill C-5 provides—I'm not putting words in Steve's mouth—momentum in the economy to move things forward. That's part one. The short answer is yes.
The second part of it is that there are a whole bunch of other projects that aren't building $200-billion major energy. There are the $10-million and the $5-million projects. They scale horizontally. If you're doing 20 of these, you're kind of there. These are also major projects, but there are a bunch of little ones that are put together. I don't think we should lose sight of how the government can, while it's looking for two- or three-year approvals, or whatever, be doing a lot of work on the ground that employs tradesfolk at the local level and indigenous folks—we use those folks in our projects—and builds the momentum.
I think we can walk and chew gum at the same time. We can do big projects and medium projects at the same time as we move forward. Investors will come forward on them.