Thank you for mapping that out. It seems completely understandable to me, then, that Canadians are raising concerns that there wasn't early consultation either in the construction of this bill or on the objective that it seeks to achieve, particularly with rights and title holders.
You have spoken about trust.
So have you, Chief Sunshine. Thank you for being here today. Given the many points that you have made, are you also concerned about the fact that there are no clear definitions of national interest? There are no definitions of criteria for either projects or communities. We have been told by the AFN National Chief that, so far, rights and title holders and treaty people—and the people in the Treaty 6 whom I represent remind me all the time that we are all treaty people.... Can you expand on your concerns on the lack of consultation with rights and title holders? How can the government actually do that to get to the objective it says it wants to achieve?