Yes. I think it's safe to say that what's in the law is really what matters.
What are your views on the fact that there are these vague concepts that would constitute the national interest, but one could make an argument on almost every single factor in every single way about any project that might be under consideration? Do you have any comments on the uncertainty around that sort of ad hoc, project-by-project, case-by-case adjudication rather than what I think you were probably leaning towards in your opening comments instead—that is, actually fixing and creating attractive and competitive investment and fiscal and regulatory conditions to attract private sector investment and a government with the will to back proponents to build on the back end?