No, not at all. It's a question of keeping everything simple, above board, and non-political, if that's possible. That's not a criticism, of course.
I would like to answer the question this way. After two years, Mr. Forbes and I began appearing before the Pension Review Board, not always with success, and we had to ask for interpretation hearings. On two occasions we took cases to the Supreme Court of Canada, both of which we won, but we didn't want to do that. If we had had an ombudsman, none of that would have been necessary, in my opinion. Now, that may be a pie in the sky, but that's the way I look at it.