Okay.
Then I have this next question. It's been my observation in my life--and I've observed a lot of things in my years--that there is some correctness in the old proverb that says, “There's wisdom in many counsellors.” In that sense, I think perhaps an argument could be made for having a committee--or as we have now, on the Veterans Review and Appeal Board, that you have three people instead of one or five instead of only one. I'm wondering why you would advocate so strongly for giving so much power to only one person and the position that he or she holds, as opposed to having a committee or a small group of people who can hear both sides of an issue and hopefully come up with a wise decision on how it should be handled.