Okay. This is my next question, then. I don't really quite fully understand your perception of the mandate of the ombudsman or ombudsperson, whatever we're going to call that individual. In some of your talk in your presentation, you indicated that the decision of that ombudsman would be final and binding and not appealable, yet on the other hand this individual could make a mistake and it would be a good idea if there were some method of appeal. So I'm not sure whether you're advocating for final and binding and no further appeal, or whether you think.... Because in other statements you seem to say that yes, you could take it further.
I think that in all such cases in Canada, you can still involve the courts. Maybe your solicitor friend there could help with that. That's an impression I have, that you can go beyond the judgment of a single person or a tribunal by taking it to the courts. I wonder if that's accurate.