Let me give you an example of something that happens now.
We have a veteran who loses both his legs in the service of his country. He comes back and, for whatever reason, he decides he's going to leave the military. He'll receive a pension and he'll receive all the assistance that VAC can give him. Then, of course, he realizes that because of maybe PTSD or his injuries, he can no longer work again anywhere else. He's then advised to apply for a Canada pension disability. He applies and he probably will receive it. The amount that he receives from a Canada pension disability is immediately reduced by the amount he receives in his superannuation, his forces pension. He's not 65, but that happens immediately. If that person wanted to advocate that change—and this is a veteran now—you would have a veteran going back to DND and looking to change this. Do you not see a possible confusion in direction that the veteran may have in this particular issue?