Well, I agree with you once again. I think the charter, the ombudsman's position, and the bill of rights should be living documents. I think they should change as needed, as time goes by. When we recognize there's a problem, I think we need to address it and not wait for it to fester to the point where it can't be addressed. I agree with you that it should be a living document.
There is one thing I would be interested in you elaborating on. I think I heard you correctly. You said you didn't think the ombudsman could overrule or reintroduce decisions of VRAB, and I think they should be able to do that. It sounds like we have a difference of opinion.
I'd like to know why you think the ombudsman shouldn't be able to reintroduce or take a decision back to VRAB.