Once again, I think it would be up to the minister, if not a committee formed specifically for that. I think one year would be way too short, because he's probably still learning his or her job in that timeframe; two years, three years at a minimum, if not five years. Ten years, in my opinion, is too long.
Renewable--I think that would once again be up to the minister of the day or whatever committee is the governing committee, if you want to use that term. There has to be a check and balance. By the same token, the minister and/or committee, if you're going the committee route, should have the capability of removing the ombudsman, because, heaven forbid, regardless of all the honesty, integrity, loyalty, and so forth, sometimes people make a mistake or get into a position where the mistake is not palatable for the veterans.
I mentioned veterans specifically because they're the ones who are going to be served by this individual. They and their families are the ones who will be served by this individual, and to be quite frank, if he or she is not doing the job.... There are many mechanisms other than committees here; the veterans associations are going to come aboard him or her, pointing out the problems in regard to any ombudsman.