I think we have agreement on the one. We've stated right from the beginning that we wanted to establish an ombudsman. Actually not everybody was onside at the time. Right now I think they are, and these hearings have been important because they have embraced that need.
So that we aren't caught by people saying we didn't ask them, or we didn't care for what they said, how do we melt those 53 down? How do we know who to talk to so that as a government and as a committee we can do our job and gather that at the end of it? We can take the leadership--that's not the issue. We know what we want to do. Now we're looking at implementation. We're looking at the mandate, the establishment of the rules and regulations, who they report to, and what they should be able to do.
We all have our ideas, and I think those ideas are getting focused. But we want to make sure that at the end of it we don't have the comments that have come from Mr. Hoppe and Mr. Gollner that we didn't ask them or listen to them. We don't want that and you don't want that. This is an opportunity to put in place as pure an ombudsman as we can--a position we agree on.