That's right, and it's wrong. That's why it needs to change: to be more equitable. I myself would prefer, if you wanted to, to go ten, seven, five, ten, and then five, five, five, five. That's what our fisheries committee does, and this was actually brought forward by many of your colleagues on that side—which I liked. But if you're going to go seven, seven, seven, seven, then five, five, five, five, and just repeat the first round, only with five-minute intervals, at least we on this side of the fence will get an opportunity to ask a second set of questions.
