Ditto to what you said. To repeat it, Rob, I take what you did in the most positive light, which was to get us started, which you did. That's a good thing.
As David said, it's not rocket science, and the witnesses did not, in the main, comment on any of these points. I don't think we want to go back and say, well, here are a bunch of questions.
They want us to do something. We use our judgment, come up with a consensus report. They will appreciate more that we did it quickly, and they'll forgive us a few little things around the edges. They'll be happier with that than if we get so wrapped up in making it perfect that we get nothing. I'll repeat what I said a long time ago: let's not let perfection be the enemy of the good.
Is there an equivalent
in French for that?